Tuesday, January 25, 2011
RM2bil Roads for Sarawak
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Puduraya bus station
Friday, January 21, 2011
penang top in investment
Thursday, January 20, 2011
ulu jelai hydroelectric project
Welcome to SMEC
SMEC is a professional services firm with Australian origins and a global footprint that provides high-quality consultancy services on major infrastructure projects. SMEC has over 4,000 employees and an established network of over 40 offices in Australia, Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia and Asia Pacific. SMEC provides consultancy services for the lifecycle of a project, to a broad range of sectors including: Transport; Water; Natural Resources and Environment; Buildings, Urban Development and Local Government; Energy and Renewables; and Social Development.
Terminal Bandar Tasik Selatan
As reported in the paper, as on 18 Jan, only nine out of 51 bus operators had moved use the terminal. The crowd was not there. There seem to be confusion where to go to board the bus.
The terminal is supposed to be very advanced equipped with the modern facilities and technology. Perhaps the peoples are not being given the full story, there are some hidden x-factors and only the rosy news are given to the public. Why are the operators not willing to move??.
I can see two basic issues:
1. The Terminal Bandar Tasik Selatan is overbuilt, over costed and overspent.
2. The mindset of the authorities is that of the Master and Slaves. They think that they, the authority are the master, and the buses operators and passengers are the slaves.
1. Over built complex.
Do you really need the expansive terminal with expansive tiles and facilities. I was surprise when I visited Sydney and saw their small monorail. It was small and can be attached to an existing shopping complex. I thought they are being practical, as monorail are for transportation and not meant to win any international awards.
Similarly if we go to London, we see the tubes, there is only one system. Their lines maybe 1000 times longer than us. We can boost of having multisystem, LRT, the Star and will be MRT and monorail and communter and railway. If any awards we can get is the award on the number of system, but at the end it was return to the government to run them.
2. Master and slave relation.
There seem to be surcharges, RM1 plus the rm10 per entry and rm10 for the exit. It seem a small amount,but again we do not know the total revenue and expenses of the buses. The CVLB had given the directive to all the buses concerned to move by 31 Jan.
There seem to be problem on the ticket systems. may be that had been addressed.
I remember the same chaos happened when the terminal of the airport moves to KLIA. Bags were not loaded as the systems fails. The information system failed and passenger do not know where their aircrafts were. Even the pilots were having hard time to find their aircrafts.
However, as I said earlier, these are not the concerned of the Masters, because they main job is to please the bigger MASTER. My perception is, the same problem is being faced by Terminal Bandar Tasik Selatan
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
jerejak project
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
failed jerejak project
By ZUHRIN AZAM AHMAD
zuhrinazam@thestar.com.my | Jan 19, 2011
‘Explain Jerejak’s RM30mil loss’
KUALA LUMPUR: The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) wants the Auditor-General to compile a special report on the Pulau Jerejak island resort development’s alleged losses of RM30mil.
PAC chairman Datuk Seri Azmi Khalid said the committee felt that the matter was urgent as it involved public money.
“PAC would like to know more about the project and the alleged losses but we are in the dark.
“We cannot simply probe the matter without any financial report and the Auditor-General is the best authority to provide it,” he told newsmen after chairing the PAC meeting at Parliament House here yesterday.
Auditor-General Tan Sri Ambrin Buang and senior officials from the Higher Education Ministry were present at the inquiry.
Azmi said he had spoken to Ambrin on the need for the committee to have a financial report before it could initiate any inquiry.
“I have talked about this unofficially with the Auditor-General and will decide whether to make it an official request at the committee’s meeting tomorrow.
The project was a joint-venture between the Penang Development Corporation (PDC) and UDA Holdings Berhad to develop an island resort called Tropical Island Resort (TIR) on the former penal code and leper detention island.
UDA holds the controlling 51% stake in TIR while the remaining shares are held by PDC.
Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the state government was considering lodging a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission on the failed project.
Lim said PDC’s RM15.42mil in TIR and the loan to TIR amounting to RM3.6mil could not be recouped. He also said TIR failed to pay RM10.6mil in land premium to the Penang Land and Mines Department.
Earlier, Azmi chaired an inquiry on the Auditor-General’s report on Politeknik Muadzam Shah in Pekan (Pahang) which took 10 years to complete and incurred a cost over-run of RM110mil. The initial cost of the project was RM219mil.
“The officials from the (Higher Education) ministry could not provide us with much information since the project started a long time ago.
“They are all new officers and did not have any idea on the project but we will continue with the enquiry,” he said.